Starting February 21, Michigan’s paid sick leave legislation goes into effect, requiring all businesses, including small businesses and restaurants, to provide paid sick leave to all employees. This legislation includes a private right of action, outsourcing enforcement to trial attorneys instead of the state. While this provision is designed to protect workers, its vagueness can lead to inconsistent interpretations and increased litigation. It would be a win for lawyers at the cost of employers and employees. Eliminating the private right of action and placing the onus on state enforcement bodies could benefit both workers and businesses.
Streamline Enforcement to Avoid Costly Litigation
As it stands, the provisions lack clarity. Without it, employees may find themselves filing unnecessary lawsuits that burden courts and mainly benefit lawyers. Eliminating these provisions would reduce the risk of costly litigation, benefiting both employees and businesses by ensuring disputes are resolved more efficiently. While employees lose the ability to sue directly, the intention is that the state would still ensure compliance by pursuing violations.
Enforcement as a Government Function
The enforcement of laws should be a government responsibility. Removing Private Rights of Action would instead mean that enforcement is left in the hands of state agencies. Employees would report violations to a state enforcement body, like the Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity, rather than pursuing their grievances in court.
Shifting enforcement to state agencies ensures consistency, fairness, and expert handling of violations, reducing the burden on workers to navigate complex legal proceedings.
Decrease Uncertainty for Business Owners
For business owners, eliminating the private right of action reduces the risk of unexpected lawsuits, making compliance requirements more predictable and manageable. It provides a more straightforward enforcement process where businesses know their obligations are assessed by state regulators rather than potentially facing multiple private lawsuits.
Balance Rights and Responsibilities
Removing the private right of action and rebuttable presumption balances the needs of employees and employers. It reduces litigation reliance, ensures fair enforcement by the government, and fosters a healthier work environment where compliance is prioritized and disputes are resolved efficiently. Streamlining enforcement supports both Michigan’s workforce and business community, making employment laws effective and practical for everyone.
Stay up to date on Michigan policy, including the today’s top policy issues.
